(October 14, 2021) The first population “expert” of the modern era was Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766-1834) an English Economist. “Malthusian Theory” postulated the world’s population would increase geometrically, while food production would progress only arithmetically, and thus would led to starvation. His book. Principle of Population, published in 1798 had far reaching effect on British society, though his ideas would be considered strange and radical today. He argued that the poor of society ought to be committed to “workhouses” where they would become virtual slaves. In this way, the population could be controlled by discouraging the growth of poor families. Malthus’ theory turned out a spectacular failure though, as throughout the 19th century, there was an agricultural revolution in Great Britain, and mass starvation was never a threat.
Malthus father was an admirer of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the French philosopher whose ideas helped give birth to the infamous French Revolution. Malthus was correct that population increased. But thanks to the Industrial Revolution, the wealth of an emerging middle class brought the United Kingdom from a Middle Ages Feudal economy to a free market system, with increased production.
With similar “Malthusian” projections, Stanford Biologist, Paul Ehrlich predicted, in his book, The Population Bomb, 1968, that it was already too late to prevent mass starvation and disease caused death of hundreds of millions within the next decade of the 1970’s. But, like Malthus, Ehrlich was an academic with failed theories. His morbid secular prophecies of mass death never materialized. Years after his ideas were debunked and rejected, an unrepentant Ehrlich maintains he was right all along! Like Malthus, the only thing he correctly predicted was the increase in population. Duh!
Why did Malthus and Ehrlich develop ideas that too many people would chase too few goods and foodstuffs, and that everyone else in the world needed to embrace their wacky ideas and theories?
At the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century, the British Empire came into its own, with colonies and expansion throughout the world. The “sun never set on the British Empire,” and the tiny island nation ruled the seas. The English were also responsible for promulgating the “gospel message,” taking the Holy Bible throughout the world. English became the universal language, thanks mostly to British influence, and the Bible became the most read book on earth.
With the invention of the printing press, and moveable type, the mass production of books, especially the Bible were made available throughout the world. Also available for reading and study were the works of those considered the brilliant thinkers and essayists of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, Machiavelli, Descartes, Hobbes, Rosseau, Marx, Engels, Nietzsche and Darwin were all widely read — especially by those in the University systems of Europe, as the movements of Rationalism and Humanism began to flourish.
These worldly philosophers shared a belief in the rejection of moral authority (A Sovereign God) and sought to establish their ideas and their authority to solve the problems of mankind. While Charles Darwin’s Origin of the Species is his most well known work, it was his later book; The Descent of Man which had greatest effect on world history. Darwin intended that his theory of “survival of the fittest” be applied to human interaction — and it was, and expressed in the two World Wars of the 20th Century.
The thoughts of Darwin, Marx, Engels and other worldly philosophers influenced the political and military leaders of the late 19th century. Darwin had written; “care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.” This was the inspiration behind Hitler’s “superior Aryan race.”
Without the guiding force of the Law of God and the Holy Bible, hundreds of millions were killed in the 20th century, incited by the vain philosophies of “survival of the fittest,” “no conscience,” “might makes right,” and “the end justifies the means.” Distilled to their basic elements, this was the message of the “world’s greatest philosophers.”
Of course, it is from these ungodly men and women that the ideas of socialism, communism and fascism are derived. When they intersect with the supposed need to control the earth’s population (Malthus was an influencer of Darwin) the present state of the world we live in may become a bit clearer.
Like Malthus, and then Ehrlich, there is a new generation of thinkers who have determined that there are just too many people in the world, and it is their belief that there is a need to act now to prevent worldwide catastrophe.
Who are they, and what is their agenda? In 2009, a group of the world’s billionaires met secretly, in New York City to discuss their idea of the world’s greatest need; population control. They call themselves “The Good Club,” and according to leaked accounts, included Bill and Melinda Gates, George Soros, David Rockefeller, Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner, Warren Buffett and Michael Bloomberg among others. They object of their meeting was to “overcome political and religious obstacles to change.” The Sunday Times reported that “a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.
Several months later, in a TED talk, Bill Gates confirmed at least a part of the agenda of “The Good Club” : “Now, if we do a really good job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive heath services, we could lower that [present world population] by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” According to Gates’ statement, this would represent an absolute reduction of the World’s population (2010) of the order 680 million to 1.02 billion.
“The Good Club” has continued its meetings and “philanthropic” agenda of population control since 2009. Interestingly, a close confidante of Bill Gates for the past decade, at least, has been Dr. Anthony Fauci. Both men have been fascinated by the potential of vaccines to limit population growth, which on the surface makes no sense medically, since vaccines are intended to prevent illness and death, and not used for “population control,” but that is Gate’s statement above. If point “A” is lowering the population and point “B” is vaccination, how does one get from A to B unless something bad happens?
In January 2017, after the election of new U.S. President Donald Trump, Dr. Anthony Fauci, proclaimed “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” he said in a speech titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration” at Georgetown University Medical Center. He delivered it just days before Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017.
Dr. Fauci was in an excellent position to predict the next Pandemic, as it was his department in the National Institute of Heath which funded research on bat viruses, at the University of North Carolina, and then transferred the program to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Beyond any doubt, “gain of function” (GoF is the euphemism for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses) was the object of this research. The question remains; why increase the deadliness of a virus? Further, what is the reason for splicing a bat virus with four other viruses in order to make the contagion one that would severely infect humans? Ask Dr. Fauci. Senator Rand Paul did, but Dr. Fauci denied the accusation. But later, emails obtained by The Intercept, from Dr. Fauci’s government email account showed gain of function is exactly what was happening in the NIH funded Wuhan Chinese military lab.
Whether the launch of the Covid-19 virus was purposeful or accidental, it is undeniable that the effect has been universal throughout the world. As has been the implementation of universal vaccination. Less than a year from the launch of what is becoming a mandatory vaccination program, we are learning; the vaccines don’t prevent infection, they don’t confer immunity against the disease, and they contain potential deadly elements and pathogens that may confer greater harm in the coming months and years. The evidence is very clear that those areas of the world that are most highly vaccinated also have the highest rate of new Covid infection. Even in nations such as Israel, with 99% of the population fully vaccinated, the majority of new hospitalizations of Covid-19 are those who have been vaccinated.
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded more deaths and adverse events associated with Covid-19 vaccines, than all other vaccines combined since 1990. Over 17,000 deaths have been associated with Covid-19 vaccines in the United States. 780,000 adverse events have been reported, including Guillen Barr disease, cardiac myopathy, neurological complications, cancers, etc. Since only 1-10% of deaths and adverse events are captured within the VAERS system, the potential consequences of the “cure” may far exceed the disease itself! Who knows what the potential death toll may amount to 1, 2, 5 years from now? If these figures represent a vast underestimation of the real impact of the new vaccines, imagine the damage done if vaccine mandates are applied to children, for whom there is no risk of death from Covid? In recent days the FDA has considered and approved boosters for the Johnson and Johnson and Moderna vaccines. If the first, second and third haven’t worked, and there have been more deaths from Covid since the introduction of the vaccines, why should we expect a different result with additional injections? Unlike any drugs launched in modern history, sadly, there is not a progression of phase 1, 2 and 3 double blind, placebo controlled studies done on these vaccines. No animal studies as a prelude to limited human trials.
In the 19th Century, the world lapped up the “knowledge” of science presented by one of modern history’s first eugenicists — Charles Darwin. His philosophy of “Survival of the Fittest” enthralled the world with a false ideology. Darwin didn’t live to see his ungodly thinking come to fruition. But today is different. The evil thoughts and ideas of men can be quickly communicated, a dark side to Daniel’s prophecy in Daniel 12:4.
Are we on the threshold of the prophecy of Revelation 13:3 — where the world will marvel, and be compelled by the historical descendants of the worldly philosophers — intent on shaping the world to their ideal? The thinking of the 19th Century threw the world off track in the 20th Century, because the influential men of books and arts kicked God out of their world. The Masters of the present age are taking us in the same direction.
World News and Prophecy Review